Montana State Fund 24th Annual Medical Conference Evaluation Name(Required) First Last Email(Required) This is where your certificate will be sentCertificate Needed(Required) Case Manager (CCMC) Claims Examiner (ERD) Insurance Producers / Licensed Claims Adjuster (SAO) Legal (CLE) Medical (ACCME) Nursing (ANCC) Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Counselor (CRC/CCRC) General Attendees Please note, all attendees must fill out an evaluation. If you need more than one certificate type you will have to reenter your information in a second submission.Which sessions did you attend?(Required) Wednesday 2:00 – 3:00: LEGISLATIVE UPDATES AND CASE LAW REVIEW Wednesday 3:00 – 4:00: ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION Thursday 9:30 – 10:30: IMPAIRMENT, BACK TO THE FUTURE: AMA GUIDES 5TH, 6TH PRINT, 6TH 2024 DIGITAL Thursday 10:40 – 11:40: WORK RELATED MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS Thursday 12:45 – 1:45: HEALTHCARE TRENDS IMPACTING WORKERS’ COMPENSATION Thursday 2:00 – 3:00: PANEL DISCUSSION: UPPER EXTREMITY CLAIM STUDY Thursday 3:30 – 4:30: PAIN SCIENCE Friday 8:45 – 9:45: RESILIENCE Friday 10:00 – 11:00: TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY: WHAT’S THE EVIDENCE Select AllProfessional Integrity AttestationI attest to attending these sessions in their entirety(Required) yes no Write in intended practice change(s) based on the information provided at this conference(Required)Identify one common ethical dilemmas in workers’ compensation and explain the competing interests involved (patient, employer, provider, and payer)(Required)Identify one common breakdown in communication, documentation, and expectations that contribute to delays, disputes, or prolonged disability.(Required)Discuss one healthcare trend outside of workers comp and project how those trends will directly/indirectly affect workers comp(Required)After the presentations do you feel better able to identify ways to meet the challenges of the workers' compensation environment? Yes No Other If no, please explainPlease rate the following session objectives on a scale of 1 – 5Please rate how well the conference sessions enhanced your understanding of key workers’ compensation topics (such as statutory changes, ethical considerations, impairment ratings, treatment trends, communication issues, and pain science). 5 – completely agree 4 – agree 3 – neutral 2 – disagree 1 – completely disagree Other How effectively did the sessions improve your ability to apply new knowledge or skills in your role (e.g., analyzing trends, setting expectations, managing claims, or supporting recovery)? 5 – completely agree 4 – agree 3 – neutral 2 – disagree 1 – completely disagree Other I understand how the recent statutory changes to workers compensation apply to my practice 5 – completely agree 4 – agree 3 – neutral 2 – disagree 1 – completely disagree Other Please answer if you attended ‘LEGISLATIVE UPDATES AND CASE LAW REVIEW’ session.I can identify at least three common ethical dilemmas in workers’ compensation and explain the competing interests involved (patient, employer, provider, and payer) 5 – completely agree 4 – agree 3 – neutral 2 – disagree 1 – completely disagree Other Please answer if you attended ‘ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION’ sessionI understand impairment calculations and reasons to adapt newest edition of Guides. 5 – completely agree 4 – agree 3 – neutral 2 – disagree 1 – completely disagree Other Please answer if you attended ‘IMPAIRMENT, BACK TO THE FUTURE: AMA GUIDES 5TH, 6TH PRINT, 6TH 2024 DIGITAL’ session.I can list at least three newer treatments to consider for patients with musculoskeletal disorders 5 – completely agree 4 – agree 3 – neutral 2 – disagree 1 – completely disagree Other Please answer if you attended ‘WORK RELATED MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS’ session.I can analyze healthcare trends outside of workers comp and project how those trends will directly/indirectly affect workers comp 5 – completely agree 4 – agree 3 – neutral 2 – disagree 1 – completely disagree Other Please answer if you attended ‘HEALTHCARE TRENDS IMPACTING WORKERS’ COMPENSATION’ session.I can identify common breakdowns in communication, documentation, and expectations that contribute to delays, disputes, or prolonged disability. 5 – completely agree 4 – agree 3 – neutral 2 – disagree 1 – completely disagree Other Please answer if you attended the ‘PANEL DISCUSSION: UPPER EXTREMITY CLAIM STUDY’ session.I can recognize key influencers of pain including context, beliefs, expectations, and nervous system sensitivity. 5 – completely agree 4 – agree 3 – neutral 2 – disagree 1 – completely disagree Other Please answer if you attended the ‘PAIN SCIENCE’ session.I can identify one area of my life to practice resilience 5 – completely agree 4 – agree 3 – neutral 2 – disagree 1 – completely disagree Other Please answer if you attended the ‘RESILIENCE’ session.I can describe the expected recovery timeline and expectations for the different severities of traumatic brain injury. 5 – completely agree 4 – agree 3 – neutral 2 – disagree 1 – completely disagree Other Please answer if you attended the ‘TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY: WHAT’S THE EVIDENCE’ session.Overall Conference SurveyWhich aspects of the conference were most valuable to you?How could we improve future conferences (content, faculty selection, clarity of objectives, topic variety)?Did this conference actively promote improvements in medical care and claims management that were free from commercial bias and/or promotion?(Required) yes no Other On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely are you to recommend the Montana State Fund Medical Conference to a friend or colleague?(Required)5 – definitely will recommend4321 – will not recommend5 being very likely or definitely will recommend and 1 being very unlikely or definitely will not recommend Additional feedback and comments
